Monday, November 23, 2009
For Tuesday
Hello all,
We opened the class today with a contemplative exercise that involved us thinking about the past and of course by proxy, our future. Remember, thinking about the present is key to writing, as you are constructing a text that lives in the present, constructed in a past movement, and engaged in the future.
We then shifted to discussing the parameters for peer review. These parameters were:
1. to read the text once without comment
2. to read the text again (with a keen commenting eye)
The parameters were:
Purpose and audience:
-Does the draft accomplish its purpose--to inform readers, to persuade them, to entertain them, to call them to action?
-Is the draft appropriate for the audience? Does it account for the audience's knowledge of the subject, level of interest, an possible attitudes toward the subject?
Focus
-Is the thesis clear?
-Do the introduction and conclusion clearly focus on the central idea?
-Are any paragraphs too long or too short for easy reading?
Organization and Paragraphing
-Are there enough organizational cues for readers?
-Are ideas presented in a logical order?
-Are any paragraphs too long or too short?
Content
-Is the supporting material relevant and persuasive?
-Which ideas need further development?
-Where might material be delated?
Point of View
-Is the draft free of distracting shifts in point of view (from I to you)?
-Is the dominant point of view--first person, second person, or third person--appropriate for your purpose and audience?
We moved through peer review in class. If you do not have a peer review, please email me and I will get you a person. (AJ--I have your draft so I will be sending it out).
Remember for class on Tuesday, you need to revise your draft for instructor-review.
Thanks and have a great weekend.
Take care,
Kat
We opened the class today with a contemplative exercise that involved us thinking about the past and of course by proxy, our future. Remember, thinking about the present is key to writing, as you are constructing a text that lives in the present, constructed in a past movement, and engaged in the future.
We then shifted to discussing the parameters for peer review. These parameters were:
1. to read the text once without comment
2. to read the text again (with a keen commenting eye)
The parameters were:
Purpose and audience:
-Does the draft accomplish its purpose--to inform readers, to persuade them, to entertain them, to call them to action?
-Is the draft appropriate for the audience? Does it account for the audience's knowledge of the subject, level of interest, an possible attitudes toward the subject?
Focus
-Is the thesis clear?
-Do the introduction and conclusion clearly focus on the central idea?
-Are any paragraphs too long or too short for easy reading?
Organization and Paragraphing
-Are there enough organizational cues for readers?
-Are ideas presented in a logical order?
-Are any paragraphs too long or too short?
Content
-Is the supporting material relevant and persuasive?
-Which ideas need further development?
-Where might material be delated?
Point of View
-Is the draft free of distracting shifts in point of view (from I to you)?
-Is the dominant point of view--first person, second person, or third person--appropriate for your purpose and audience?
We moved through peer review in class. If you do not have a peer review, please email me and I will get you a person. (AJ--I have your draft so I will be sending it out).
Remember for class on Tuesday, you need to revise your draft for instructor-review.
Thanks and have a great weekend.
Take care,
Kat
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment